Revision
Can recipients identify the current draft, prior versions and who changed what?
Public-safe self-assessment
Use these questions before choosing a technology. Record only aggregate workflow observations—never classified information, CUI, document contents or procurement-sensitive details.
Can recipients identify the current draft, prior versions and who changed what?
Can everyone prove the exact bytes/state presented to each signer?
Can a recipient distinguish a living draft from the sealed final record?
Does verification travel with the record, or require access to the originating portal?
Can later changes preserve the signed original and explicit derivation?
Are signature mathematics, credential trust, identity, time and revocation reported separately?
Can authorized systems interpret structure without screen-scraping a PDF?
Is semantic structure preserved, and is conformance supported by actual test evidence?
Can current systems receive a PDF copy while the authoritative record remains verifiable?
What remains possible without network access or vendor availability?
If several answers depend on a portal, manual reconciliation or unverifiable PDF copies, a bounded document-substrate evaluation may be useful. This diagnostic does not establish suitability, approval or procurement eligibility.